Employment in EU

Introducing a chapter on employment is a good thing, but if the community takes steps to ensure social protection and a fair taxable future, then it still has pure rhetorical risks – or worse, promotes flexibility and deregulation defaults. Of course, I welcome the development of new opportunities to eradicate poverty and social exclusion, which will eventually lead to the abolition of the “fourth action programme” in this area. Even if the goal is limited to experimental financing, significant action can still be taken. But as long as social rights, such as minimum income rights, are not included in the treaty, the ambition of the “European social model” will be very mild.

The reference to the Social Charter of 1961 and 1989 makes fundamental social rights a guiding principle of European action but does not give a justiciable character to these rights. We are still far from a Europe of civil and social rights. The new non-discrimination provision provides for the possibility of adopting measures to combat discrimination on grounds of sex, race or ethnic origin, religion or religious belief, disability or ex-orientation, but it does not automatically prohibit such discrimination and, moreover, the measures must be taken unanimously in the Council.

Study Program-Studimed

Based on the experience of the Studimed organization, the Mediterranean Student Union (1993), the Open University (1994) and the second Studimed, the Mediterranean Education and Training Exhibition (1996), decided to give the third edition of Studimed life. The objectives of the event are: Encourage training by inspiring encounters among young people, universities, local authorities, SMEs and education and training schools; Position graduates based on university choices; Provide information, conduct seminars by experts, draft resumes, prepare job interviews and build business methods; Encourage the training of young European citizens by raising awareness of the new generation of European Union programmes.

Exhibitors will belong to three categories: 1) university orientation: Italian universities will be invited and visitors will be given the 1997 University Guide, created by the Ministry of University and Scientific and Technological Research in collaboration with the Rui Foundation, which deals with university guidance with unanimously recognized skills; 2) orientation to the labor market: the Society for Youth Entrepreneurship, EURES (European network of information on the labor market) and the European Commission will be invited to respond to the needs of those who want information on career opportunities; 3) post-diploma and post-graduate training: schools promoting Masters accredited by As for (the association between the main business schools and corporate management training structures) will be invited.

Federal

As a result of the Maastricht Treaty and the Monetary Union, the European Union is currently the protagonist of the process of accelerating internal political dynamics

his is a very important phenomenon and certainly destined to improve the status of the alliance, although this experience is not always clear or linear. It is during these days that we are witnessing the growth of democratic institutions like the European Parliament, which, unfortunately, may be a possible attempt to discredit the European Commission, inspired by community performers. The revenge wish of the supranational flag. In general, together with the secretary of MFE, it can be observed that there is now a decisive competition between the supporters of federal construction and the defenders of intergovernmental Europe.

The purpose of this intervention is to contribute to those who line up for the success of supranational democracy like the Federalists, but at the same time feel the need to clarify its characteristics so that the European Union is fully aware of the potential, responsibility Responsibility and limitations themselves must distinguish between them. In fact, European federalists can play an active role in supranationality only when they know how to form the most conscious part, are more motivating in terms of values, and are less constrained by direct interests.

CIVIL SOCIETY

The conclusion of the 40-page Cologne summit, the term “EU Council” appeared 130 times, the word “Meeting” 42 times, the heads of state and government collectively complacent, and the words 41 times “citizens”, “people”, “Poverty”, “Women”, “Taxpayers” appear – every time – only once. Peace (5 times), basic rights (4 times), democracy (3 times), justice, freedom, transparency and youth (2 times each time) are more likely, 12 times below the “best period”, Indicates the timetable for the implementation of the decision of the European Council. In the words “European Parliamentary Elections”, there was a critical moment in the European Union, the European Council’s democratic life a week later, and only the time to recall a new committee. Need to mention 41 times, far ahead of the European Parliament (9 times), the European Central Bank (2 times) – with the council has ceded the power to speak on the foreign exchange market – the court of justice and the audit court (once)

Beyond words – this, however, greatly affects the language of the political society – the “decision” in the European Council is unacceptable, at least three points: the employment of the EU Treaty, which is a disagreement; the revision of the “Amsterdam Treaty” The method of diplomatic negotiations is ineffective and “as soon as possible” mentions the true reform of ITU; its basic right to intent, the inter-agency declaration in Paris before the end of 2000 to hold a wedding to “consider whether and if so, how ( They may be included in the treaty.”

Regarding the consistency of MM Guterres, Aznar, Jospin, D’Alema, Dehaene, Kok, Juncker, Klima, when they agree with the German President’s conclusion, they know that their parliamentary majority (plural or not) requires another method and another Kind of reform scale? The German Foreign Minister “dare” to publish the words “Constitution” and “Federal Europe” before the European Parliament, and the parties at the national and European levels rejected this method. What is this coherence? Intergovernmental? It is time for citizens to climb the (virtual) roadblocks of participatory democracy and use the Helsinki Council of Europe – all political and legal means to legalize Cologne’s decisions.

Euro MP

Pauline Green, leader of the Socialist Party of the European Parliament, today condemned the death penalty of the Turkish court against the rebellious Kurdish leader Abdullah Okaran.

She called on parliamentarians across Europe to put pressure on members of the Turkish parliament, and if the appeal to the Supreme Court fails, they will formally confirm the death sentence. P said Mrs. Green: “I find it difficult to accept that a member of the European Commission and the signatories of the European Convention on Human Rights should declare the death penalty because the country’s own Minister of Justice only said the decision two weeks ago. The European Court of Justice has Binding and should abolish the death penalty.

When talking about the need for the Turkish parliament to confirm the death penalty, Mrs. Green added: “I believe that all European parliamentarians have a responsibility to give priority to Turkish colleagues to ensure that they are not approved.” Mrs. Green said that the use of the death penalty would violate Turkey’s international legal commitments and “may have serious political and security implications for the EU-Turkey relationship.” Mrs. Green congratulated the Turkish Parliament for the speedy withdrawal of the military judges of the court. She said: “This is a question raised many times by my group and the entire parliament. I hope this will herald further constitutional reform so that Turkey can further promote its social democratization and achieve its goal of joining the EU. In this regard, The death penalty must also be abolished.